Comments on: Pollock surely could not have dripped this http://artmiser.wordpress.com/2007/02/06/pollock-surely-could-not-have-dripped-this/ Market Analysis for the Art World Sat, 02 Jan 2010 12:49:15 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: How to Get Six Pack Fast http://artmiser.wordpress.com/2007/02/06/pollock-surely-could-not-have-dripped-this/#comment-737 How to Get Six Pack Fast Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:21:20 +0000 http://artmiser.wordpress.com/2007/02/06/pollock-surely-could-not-have-dripped-this/#comment-737 I read your posts for a long time and should tell you that your articles are always valuable to readers. I read your posts for a long time and should tell you that your articles are always valuable to readers.

]]> By: Kory Kasler http://artmiser.wordpress.com/2007/02/06/pollock-surely-could-not-have-dripped-this/#comment-733 Kory Kasler Fri, 12 Dec 2008 12:24:23 +0000 http://artmiser.wordpress.com/2007/02/06/pollock-surely-could-not-have-dripped-this/#comment-733 Seriously, look at the painting. That isn't a Pollock. It isn't his style of drip. Pollock's work is more chaotic and random, this is more organized and slightly more classy. Totally not a Pollock. Good painting, but surely not Pollock. Seriously, look at the painting. That isn’t a Pollock. It isn’t his style of drip. Pollock’s work is more chaotic and random, this is more organized and slightly more classy. Totally not a Pollock. Good painting, but surely not Pollock.

]]> By: Lottz http://artmiser.wordpress.com/2007/02/06/pollock-surely-could-not-have-dripped-this/#comment-732 Lottz Sat, 13 Sep 2008 11:55:34 +0000 http://artmiser.wordpress.com/2007/02/06/pollock-surely-could-not-have-dripped-this/#comment-732 interesting article, thx now, about the 3 questions at the end. nr 1. if the pigments had been developed already then he could have gotten them somehow....but for paint that didn't even exist back then, hardly nr 2. yes. DaVinci's, Rembrandt's and a lot of other's masterpieces have been retouched...fixed...renovated several times and are still extremely valuable. nr 3. only question I cannot answer, I wouldn't want anything by the man. Some ppl have an "odd" taste I suppose. But a good read, thank you again Lottz interesting article, thx

now, about the 3 questions at the end.
nr 1. if the pigments had been developed already then he could have gotten them somehow….but for paint that didn’t even exist back then, hardly
nr 2. yes. DaVinci’s, Rembrandt’s and a lot of other’s masterpieces have been retouched…fixed…renovated several times and are still extremely valuable.
nr 3. only question I cannot answer, I wouldn’t want anything by the man. Some ppl have an “odd” taste I suppose.

But a good read, thank you again
Lottz

]]> By: Suspect drips already flipped « Art Miser http://artmiser.wordpress.com/2007/02/06/pollock-surely-could-not-have-dripped-this/#comment-154 Suspect drips already flipped « Art Miser Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:28:20 +0000 http://artmiser.wordpress.com/2007/02/06/pollock-surely-could-not-have-dripped-this/#comment-154 [...] by the world’s most expensive paint splatterer has gotten even more interesting. We reported a few months ago about the fallout from paint tests showing that a miraculous find of unknown Pollocks were fresher [...] [...] by the world’s most expensive paint splatterer has gotten even more interesting. We reported a few months ago about the fallout from paint tests showing that a miraculous find of unknown Pollocks were fresher [...]

]]>